From 0abf63917b6bf2d3c9fcd01359667f8770020565 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wesley Moore Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 14:02:25 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md b/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md index 3201f97..6b75678 100644 --- a/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md +++ b/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ +++ title = "Comparing Alternatives to top Written in Rust" -date = 2020-02-21T10:45:00+11:00 +date = 2020-03-21T10:45:00+11:00 -# [extra] -# updated = 2019-07-01T22:40:53+10:00 +[extra] +updated = 2020-03-22T12:52:23+11:00 +++ Recently I aliased `top` to [ytop]. Then I became aware of [bottom], and @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ from the Arch Linux system, which is a [12 core AMD Ryzen desktop PC][ryzen-pc]. `ytop` and `bottom` use a layout that appears to be inspired by [gotop]. In fact, `ytop` is written by the same person as `gotop`. `zenith` uses a layout -that's a bit more like traditional `top` with and histograms above the process +that's a bit more like traditional `top` with histograms above the process list. I typically use `top` to: