benw2/wezm.net
1
0
Fork 0
forked from wezm/wezm.net
Code Pull requests Activity

Add note about zenith supporting ZFS pools now

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Wesley Moore 2020-03-27 21:55:46 +11:00
parent 20e7c4e666
commit 8115919aa9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: BF67766C0BC2D0EE
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md
View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ title = "Comparing Alternatives to top Written in Rust"
date = 2020-03-21T10:45:00+11:00 date = 2020-03-21T10:45:00+11:00
[extra] [extra]
updated = 2020-03-23T08:50:54+11:00 updated = 2020-03-27T21:53:53+11:00
+++ +++
Recently I aliased `top` to [ytop]. Then I became aware of [bottom], and Recently I aliased `top` to [ytop]. Then I became aware of [bottom], and
@ -45,10 +45,12 @@ I typically use `top` to:
I find the `zenith` layout more information dense, with less space taken up I find the `zenith` layout more information dense, with less space taken up
with graphs. I also like the header row with info and help. The main feature with graphs. I also like the header row with info and help. The main feature
that it is missing compared to the others is temperatures — but that's in the that it is missing compared to the others is temperatures — but that's in the
list of planned features. There is one issue with `zenith`: it doesn't show my list of planned features. ~~There is one issue with `zenith`: it doesn't show my
ZFS pool. My system has an NVMe system disk and a ZFS pool of 3 SSDs that is ZFS pool. My system has an NVMe system disk and a ZFS pool of 3 SSDs that is
mounted as `/home`, which is absent in the disk summary. I've raised [an issue mounted as `/home`, which is absent in the disk summary. I've raised [an issue
on GitHub][zenith-zfs]. on GitHub][zenith-zfs].~~
**Update 27 March 2020:** Zenith 0.7.7 now shows ZFS pools.
The individual lines for each CPU in `bottom` makes the display quite noisy. I The individual lines for each CPU in `bottom` makes the display quite noisy. I
prefer the aggregated line that `ytop` shows. `ytop` has a handy `-m` option prefer the aggregated line that `ytop` shows. `ytop` has a handy `-m` option