From 8115919aa941294f68c936baa8bef138808624f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wesley Moore Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:55:46 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Add note about zenith supporting ZFS pools now --- v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md b/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md index 88ac64a..0b3a8c0 100644 --- a/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md +++ b/v2/content/posts/2020/rust-top-alternatives/index.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ title = "Comparing Alternatives to top Written in Rust" date = 2020-03-21T10:45:00+11:00 [extra] -updated = 2020-03-23T08:50:54+11:00 +updated = 2020-03-27T21:53:53+11:00 +++ Recently I aliased `top` to [ytop]. Then I became aware of [bottom], and @@ -45,10 +45,12 @@ I typically use `top` to: I find the `zenith` layout more information dense, with less space taken up with graphs. I also like the header row with info and help. The main feature that it is missing compared to the others is temperatures — but that's in the -list of planned features. There is one issue with `zenith`: it doesn't show my +list of planned features. ~~There is one issue with `zenith`: it doesn't show my ZFS pool. My system has an NVMe system disk and a ZFS pool of 3 SSDs that is mounted as `/home`, which is absent in the disk summary. I've raised [an issue -on GitHub][zenith-zfs]. +on GitHub][zenith-zfs].~~ + +**Update 27 March 2020:** Zenith 0.7.7 now shows ZFS pools. The individual lines for each CPU in `bottom` makes the display quite noisy. I prefer the aggregated line that `ytop` shows. `ytop` has a handy `-m` option