mirror of
https://github.com/wezm/wezm.net.git
synced 2025-04-09 05:00:42 +00:00
Compare commits
2 commits
b834c34019
...
2a3306a988
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
2a3306a988 | |||
cee3f628d0 |
1 changed files with 79 additions and 0 deletions
79
v2/content/posts/2024/why-chimera-linux.md
Normal file
79
v2/content/posts/2024/why-chimera-linux.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|||
+++
|
||||
title = "Why Chimera Linux"
|
||||
date = 2024-07-04T08:48:55+10:00
|
||||
|
||||
[extra]
|
||||
updated = 2024-07-04T12:24:30+10:00
|
||||
+++
|
||||
|
||||
I received a reply to my [Tech Stack 2024](@/posts/2024/tech-stack/index.md)
|
||||
post asking: Why Chimera Linux? I wrote a response that turned out longer than
|
||||
anticipated and figured I may as well post it here too. I'm not trying to
|
||||
convince you to use Chimera with this post, just note down why it appeals to
|
||||
me. That's really the crux of it: there's dozens of distros out there all with
|
||||
different goals and values and Chimera really speaks to me, for you it might be
|
||||
something else.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- more -->
|
||||
|
||||
Below is a lightly edited version of my email response.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
I like [Chimera Linux] because it's the closest distro I've found to what I would build
|
||||
if I was building my own (something I've tinkered with a few times over the
|
||||
years).
|
||||
|
||||
I like that it is a comparatively small and easy to understand system without
|
||||
giving up quite as much as you do with Alpine Linux, which to be clear, I like
|
||||
as well and use on my server. The [userland from FreeBSD][userland] is capable and easy
|
||||
to understand code wise, [Dinit] provides an init system with process monitoring,
|
||||
dependency tracking, and a service file format that doesn't require writing
|
||||
shell scripts like in FreeBSD and Alpine. [musl] is designed to be secure and
|
||||
uses quite straightforward implementations of libc functions while sticking
|
||||
closely to the POSIX standard. See the recent OpenSSH vulnerability where
|
||||
[remote code execution was not possible on musl based systems](https://fosstodon.org/@musl/112711796005712271).
|
||||
|
||||
I really like the [cbuild] system for building packages. It uses a real
|
||||
programming language (Python) to define packages and share library code. This
|
||||
makes package templates easier to write and understand over Make and shell
|
||||
based packaging systems. Packages are built in an isolated sandbox, preventing
|
||||
them depending on the host system accidentally—this is definitely an advantage
|
||||
over building packages on Arch. Most run-time dependencies are automatically
|
||||
determined so you don't have to list all those out in the package template.
|
||||
|
||||
[apk] is fast (although not as fast as Pacman when doing updates[^1]). It has a
|
||||
clever way of tracking packages where [the world file][world] specifies all the packages
|
||||
that should be present and it uses a solver to determine what needs to be
|
||||
installed/removed. The neat bit is that when you `apk del` a package it can remove all
|
||||
packages that are no longer specifically requested, whereas in Arch it's easy
|
||||
to end up with orphaned packages that are dead weight and require [manual
|
||||
maintenance to clean up](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Tips_and_tricks#Removing_unused_packages_(orphans)).
|
||||
|
||||
Chimera is also a rolling distro (like Arch) so things stay up to date. There's
|
||||
a low barrier to submitting new packages and updates, you don't have to have a
|
||||
special "committer" or "developer" account, you can just open a pull request
|
||||
like any other open-source project. Packages in the repo are built
|
||||
automatically with a build bot server for all supported architectures, whereas
|
||||
I believe Arch is still working towards automated packaging. Additionally first
|
||||
class support for multiple CPU architectures allows me to run the same system
|
||||
on different devices I use such as Raspberry Pis, RISC-V single board
|
||||
computers, and hopefully eventually my new ARM based Snapdragon X Elite laptop.
|
||||
|
||||
Having written that all out I guess Chimera feels like a distro that is
|
||||
full-featured but also simple enough that you can poke around and understand
|
||||
all the parts. It's also easy to get involved with the project.
|
||||
|
||||
[^1]: Pacman downloads in parallel (5 at time in my config), then does the actual upgrades. `apk` fetches one package at at time and then stages the upgrade before moving on to the next one. There's a couple of related open issues:
|
||||
|
||||
- <https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools/-/issues/10963>
|
||||
- <https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools/-/issues/5977>
|
||||
|
||||
[cbuild]: https://github.com/chimera-linux/cports/blob/master/Usage.md
|
||||
[cports]: https://github.com/chimera-linux/cports
|
||||
[musl]: https://musl.libc.org/
|
||||
[Dinit]: https://davmac.org/projects/dinit/
|
||||
[apk]: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools
|
||||
[userland]: https://github.com/chimera-linux/chimerautils
|
||||
[Chimera Linux]: https://chimera-linux.org/
|
||||
[world]: https://chimera-linux.org/docs/apk/world
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue